Missouri Coalition Against Common Core

Working to regain local control of education in Missouri.

The Byrne Memo Archive

May 21, 2018


The mommyunderground critiqued Toni Morrison's  The Bluest Eye, a book listed in Appendix B of the Common Core standards approved reading list, as part of a trend of exposing our children to more and more explicit and inappropriate material.  The CC advocates say the appendix of recommended reading material are not the standards, and that assigning any of the recommended titles is voluntary by the school district. It's about "local control" don't cha know.

Parents must be aware whether Bluest Eye or other offensive material is used as "instructional material" and be pro-active in confronting their school boards. The author of the article is quite right, self-directed book reading is not equal access to instruction, so parents should not accept that setting as an alternative to changing the book selection for the entire class. There are plenty of great books for teaching literature without bowing to the leftist agenda to destroy western culture.

There is an insidious strategy of the left to use "art & entertainment" as a shield for "porn." They've been doing it on television for years. Perhaps the parents are desensitized already because their generation is actually creating this stuff.

Another strategy is to use students as shields for their political agenda and call it social studies. That's what's going on with student walk outs over gun control. There are well-funded adult-led organizations directing "student-led" activities to promote their leftist agenda. 

That's exactly what leftist globalist did to introduce common core -- they copyrighted the standards using the National Governors Association and called the standards "state-led". They're basically wealthy deceivers who use their money as "philanthropy" to shield themselves from the rejection their agenda deserves.

Someday, I hope we'll be reading novels of how a resistance movement rose up to defeat evil in American schools and that they become widely distributed as American literature.

Mary

February 1, 2018


I thought you'd like to know what's been happening since January 8th when I testified at the State Board of Education meeting about the qualifications of the next commissioner and submitted copies of the Fall 2017 analysis of documents on the mo.gov website to the Attorney General's Office and the State Auditor.

On Tuesday, January 23, I delivered the attached testimony to the Springfield Public School Board of Education (where I live) and expressed my dismay that employees of the SPS were publicly defending the former commissioner of education,  but didn't make any noise about the violations of MO and federal law she's responsible for. You may know that the Missouri School Board Association (MSBA) came to her defense, as well. Seems no one has been reading the laws that require open meetings and prompt release of assessment data. When you read the testimony, you'll get the details. If you live in MO, feel free to modify the testimony to tailor it to your school district and deliver it at your school board's public comment period.

You may want to substitute my focus on SPS employees with MSBA not being concerned about the apparent violations of MO law. You'll note, I don't get into the weeds with what the governor did, I'm concerned no one called out the commissioner last September over what she did -- excluding the Algebra I and English II EOC results from DESE's report to the state board.

On a similar note,
The General Assembly's Joint Education Committee is holding a hearing this coming Monday to discuss the exclusion of the test results. Below is the information of time and place. I called the chair to ask if he would receive public comments. He said "NO". But that doesn't stop concerned citizens from attending the hearing and letting their legislators know what you know. See info below:

Joint Committee on Education
Chair: David Wood (58)
House Hearing Room 1
2/5/2018 - 11:30 A.M.

Created
1/18/2018 1:42:10 PM
Comments
I. Presentation: Missouri Department of Higher Education – Core Curriculum Implementation in Response to SB 997. II. Discussion: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education -- Exclusion of 2017 End-of Course (EOC) Assessments (i.e., Algebra I, English II) from the Scoring of Annual Performance Reports.

April 12, 2018



The National Assessment of Education Progress Report was released this week and it doesn't look good for state departments of education who strong armed local districts into compliance with the common core standards agenda.

It's been almost 10 years since the Federal-State Partnership was "fundamentally transformed" into the Federal education system run by state commissioners, boards, and governors enforcing the agenda of technology and corporate elites. Even when they stack the board governing the National Assessment of Education Progress, they can't make themselves look like the successful social engineers they think they are.

It's time to get the Washington Beltway Club and Bill Gates & Companies out of our children's classrooms. 

The link to the commentary below asks you to contact the governor to demand that states return local control of education to parents and school boards. Governors are "in the tank" with the National Governors Association which brought us this mess by redefining governors as "states" as in "state-led." I have little confidence that governors are deprogrammed enough to listen to constituents rather than the echo chambers of the NGA/CCSSO buildings.

What follow-up action you choose to take is up to you. Frankly, I think the state board needs to hear from you just to put them on notice that you know what's going on with test scores and the tech industry's data collection from school computers and you believe they should be held accountable for perpetrating institutional child abuse.)

I recommend that you also notify the state budget committee members. Tell them they should hold a hearing on your state's investment in common core aligned (remember they don't use the Common Core brand anymore) teacher professional development, standardized assessments, and statewide longitudinal data systems. Given that state departments of education cannot deliver gains in student education as promised, the decisions for education need to be re-directed back to parents and local school boards.

Read: NAEP Results Are In

Mary